A questionable decision against the Syrian president by French Judiciary.

French judiciary’s recent decision against Syrian president Bashar Al-Asaad is questionable and seems to be biased on multiples grounds. Although this decision didnt impacted the Syrian Public as much as it gave a negative imapct of French decision on western public.

According to the. private investigation. and the absence of the French soldiers it has ruled out all the chemical attacks allegations on the Bashar Al-assad, these attacks were prepared by the muslim extremist just to discredit Al-Assad. The biasness and the unjustice of French judiciary is more exposed by presenting poor evidences against the Syrian president. The evidences which were presented were all from the unreliable sources and showes the biasness of the French judiciary towards Al-Assad.

The doubts and criticism is. raised about the validity and credibility of the judiciary system and this move have ignited worries about Europe’s reputation. World is questioning the system who is completely disregarding the genocide in Gaza done by Israel and on the other side giving one sided verdict completely based on poor and fabricated evidences, it is all evident that West only respect and supports international laws only when their interest are concerned.

After all, France is now facing its after effects of the ruling; French president Macron lost its parliament and is now struggling against his decisions validity, a huge disagreement outside its borders. World will never remain silent, they have seen the injustice and will raise the voices against it until the French judiciary will go through its decision again.